Tuesday, June 5, 2012

That is the way we have always done maintenance around here


That is the way we have always done it around here

How many things, tasks, and activities are you doing because that is the way things have always been done?

Are you simply accepting that there must be a reason to be completing these tasks? Surely someone (much smarter than you) thought there was enough reason to begin the tasks in the first place.

Make sure that you take the time to do a periodic review of your maintenance tasks and ensure that each is designed to:

  1. Prevent a failure
  2. Detect a failure
  3. Comply with a law or regulations


There are many methods you can use including Reliability Centered Maintenance, PM Optimization, Maintenance Task Review and more to ensure your efforts are aimed toward the right targets.



As for the third justification for maintenance tasks – that it is somehow regulated or required by an external authority even if it is not adding value – can be a lucrative opportunity for improvement during a review process.

Because the consequences for violating a regulation or law can be significant, most people will simply accept “we cannot change it because it is required by (insert the name of the authority here).”

Are you sure?  Who says so anyway?  Have you done a review to verify if the procedure is actually required and can be traced to a specific regulation or is it an internal process that gained validation by claiming to meet an unspecified regulation?

You may find some tasks, processes and procedures that can be eliminated.   If they were not adding value – then you are getting a great deal of return for having taken the time to verify and validate that there is or is not a reason to be conducting them.

Do yourself a favor and schedule a maintenance task review as soon as possible. 

Here is a semi-related article from the brains at Harvard Business Review titled
Learned Helplessness in OrganizationsI hope you find some value in reading it.

1 comment:

  1. In my experience, and concerning regulations in my industry, the requirements are usually not extremely specific. Yes, the requirement is to ensure the brakes are in working order, but it is left up to us to decide whether it is a functional check or a complete teardown and rebuild. I believe, the opportunity is in the level of detail you choose to meet the requirement.

    ReplyDelete